Boroughly > Compare > Four Oaks vs Wylde Green
Two areas people weigh against each other constantly. Here's the honest side-by-side - price, the seven life scores, and who each one actually suits.
| Criterion | Four Oaks | Wylde Green |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | 8.4/10 | 8.9/10 |
| Schools | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Parks & green space | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| Transport | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Diversity & inclusion | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| LGBTQ+ friendly | 6/10 | 6/10 |
| Buzz & nightlife | 5/10 | 5/10 |
On price they're close - about £386k against £396k, a gap small enough that it shouldn't decide it for you.
Across the seven life scores they're closely matched, which usually means the decision comes down to the specific streets you view and how each place feels on a weekday evening.
| If you're... | Lean towards | Because |
|---|---|---|
| Families with school-age children | Four Oaks | stronger combination of school and green-space scores |
| Young professionals | Four Oaks | more going on in the evening and better connections |
| First-time buyers | Four Oaks | better price-to-transport trade-off |
| Anyone wanting a quieter life | Four Oaks | calmer, greener and lower-crime scoring |
Four Oaks is cheaper on average. Four Oaks runs about £386k to buy and £1,400/mo to rent a two-bed; Wylde Green is around £396k and £1,300/mo.
Four Oaks scores better on the combination families usually weigh most - schools, green space and safety. Four Oaks scores 9/10 for schools and 9/10 for parks; Wylde Green scores 9/10 and 8/10.
Four Oaks scores 6/10 for transport and Wylde Green scores 6/10. Journey times depend far more on where you're actually going than on a general score - set your real destinations on the Boroughly map to compare door to door.